I was three weeks in Kenya and Uganda. Occasional flashbacks and unexplained moods tell me that psychologically I have not completely returned to Finland, yet. There was nothing really extraordinary that we encountered during the trip but, even so, the world looks a little different.
I think I started to understand some of the complexity of African politics. It was difficult to find people willing to discuss politics, though. In addition to a handful of taxi drivers, my companions were Martin Meredith's book The State of Africa. A History of Fifty Years of Independence (2005) and local newspapers.
NewAfrican magazine featured a cover story on the Chinese investments in Africa. It was an article full of praise and no criticism - except for the West. "In contrast with the big shows, the charity-business and other high profile humanitarian diplomacy promoted by the West, the United Nations, NGOs and the international financial institutions, China ensured that deeds preceded words", the article levels.
The same issue features a column by the Senegalese President Abdulaye Wade titled "The Time for the West to practice what it preaches". In language that can make you feel very uncomfortable, Wade plays the West against the Chinese, reminiscent of the way African dictators used to do with the socialist threat in the 70's and 80's. "I have found that a contract that would take five years to discuss, negotiate and sign with the World Bank takes three months when we have dealt with Chinese authorities", Wade boasts. "When bureaucracy and senseless red tape impede our ability to act and when poverty persists while international functionaries drag their feet, African leaders have an obligation to opt for swifter solutions". The message is clear. We don't want to deal with the obnoxious West with its twisted code of ethics. We'd rather do business with the Chinese who never ask questions about the state of democracy and the like.
Up to our days, thrashing red tape has equaled pocketing significant benefits for the political elite in dozens of poor African countries. After the collapse of socialism, the West was able to implement more controls over their financial support. This "bureaucracy" has now been interpreted as neo-colonialism by the likes of President Wade. The Chinese have no objections to dicatators who do not respect freedom of speech or fair elections. They just want the oil and all the other minerals Africa can produce, in order to keep the chinese economy growing. It is clearly an win-win situation for both sides.
I think there really is a lesson here for "the West". Words and deeds must go hand in hand. But the West does not have a single message or a single line of operation. Free market economics and "charity-business" do not always go hand in hand. Very often they seem to collide. Churches and NGOs preach against the same free market message our governements advertise as the solution. The Chinese, in contrast, embrace free market economics and spice it with a tight control over political power.
I did ask a number of Finnish aid-workers and missionaries their opinion on succesfull projects. They all seemed to agree that a succesfull project is something the local people can own themselves. Big projects tend to be too big for local communities. They become the white man's projects, never owned and operated properly by the local people. When financial aid ceases, the project collapses. But when projects are being initiated and owned by the locals from the beginning, they have good chance of succeeding.
All this said, I must pay my respects to the Catholic Church in Africa. Wherever you go, you will find a Catholic parish. With it, you will find religious orders working with schools, health centers, agricultural projects, etc. The parishes are always "owned" by the local community. In fact, they are local communities. All outside help is integrated within this centrally organized, global and hierarchical structure which at the same time allows the organizations to freely maintain their own identities and goals for the common good. If the Catholic Church had the courage to level some of its theological barriers, it could assume a leadership position bringing together all Christian churches in the fight against ignorance, superstition, poverty and violence. None of the Protestant church bodies - including the World Council of Churches - are up to this task. Maybe the time is ripe for something new to be born.
Mar 30, 2008
Mar 5, 2008
Mental Packing
It is almost time to start packing for my trip to Kenya and Uganda. But before the plane takes off Monday morning, several things need to be taken care of. I am hopelessly behind the schedule in producing texts for the Daily Scripture podcast (Päivän Sana). Tomorrow we will try to video as many passages as possible. I still have the night for writing... And then there are another two short articles to be written before the weekend.
Friday night we will gather with a group of friends to discuss a bold vision that all of a sudden seems to be coming alive. It is quite possible that beginning of 2009 we could see the Agricola Church separated from the parish structure. It would be assigned to a consortium yet to be founded, with its separate organization, directly under the Dean of the Cathedral Parish. This would create an entirely new opportunity - and a new mode of operation.
The parish structure has long since ceased to serve larger cities. However, local parishes continue to set the rules of operation. The larger the parishes have become - and they will continue to grow due to annexations - the less capable they are in providing a sense of community for the parishioners. People hardly know what parish they belong to, let alone the name of their pastor. A linguistic factor partly explains why the medieval parish structure is still alive and kicking. There is only one word for both parish and congregation in Finnish. The New Testament promises for the community of saints have been read as stipulations for the local parish. Congregations, they do not exist. There is no legitimacy for a congregation that is not a parish. A large part of Finnish Lutheran spirituality has traditionally been channeled through revival movements with their non-parochial, non-congregationalist forms of community. Unfortunately, the most vibrant of these movements have become churches within the church with no respect for the base structure, the parish. In some cases, work in the parishes is being ridiculed. The protestant division of the church continues on the local level. I believe that the local parish/congregation needs to be reinvented and reinvigorated. It is what the Bible talks about. We want to do that. And we need to do that. Maybe not Friday night, but soon.
The last thing to do before packing is to do the necessary shopping. Finnish friends in Kenya have asked me to bring some mämmi. It is a traditional Easter delicacy that is not hard to describe. It is made out of rye flour and syrup, it is deep brown in color and it looks like crap. I am looking forward to meeting with the Nairobi customs with my plastic bags.
P.S. The return flight from Entebbe is booked for March 29.
Friday night we will gather with a group of friends to discuss a bold vision that all of a sudden seems to be coming alive. It is quite possible that beginning of 2009 we could see the Agricola Church separated from the parish structure. It would be assigned to a consortium yet to be founded, with its separate organization, directly under the Dean of the Cathedral Parish. This would create an entirely new opportunity - and a new mode of operation.
The parish structure has long since ceased to serve larger cities. However, local parishes continue to set the rules of operation. The larger the parishes have become - and they will continue to grow due to annexations - the less capable they are in providing a sense of community for the parishioners. People hardly know what parish they belong to, let alone the name of their pastor. A linguistic factor partly explains why the medieval parish structure is still alive and kicking. There is only one word for both parish and congregation in Finnish. The New Testament promises for the community of saints have been read as stipulations for the local parish. Congregations, they do not exist. There is no legitimacy for a congregation that is not a parish. A large part of Finnish Lutheran spirituality has traditionally been channeled through revival movements with their non-parochial, non-congregationalist forms of community. Unfortunately, the most vibrant of these movements have become churches within the church with no respect for the base structure, the parish. In some cases, work in the parishes is being ridiculed. The protestant division of the church continues on the local level. I believe that the local parish/congregation needs to be reinvented and reinvigorated. It is what the Bible talks about. We want to do that. And we need to do that. Maybe not Friday night, but soon.
The last thing to do before packing is to do the necessary shopping. Finnish friends in Kenya have asked me to bring some mämmi. It is a traditional Easter delicacy that is not hard to describe. It is made out of rye flour and syrup, it is deep brown in color and it looks like crap. I am looking forward to meeting with the Nairobi customs with my plastic bags.
P.S. The return flight from Entebbe is booked for March 29.
Feb 17, 2008
Weddings
Yesterday, I was interviewed for an internet broadcast on weddings (mtv3.fi/haat). The statistics say that some 60% of all weddings in Finland are celebrated according to the rites of the Lutheran Church. In addition, some 10% of the remaining civil weddings will have a church blessing.
I was surprised to find out that a second interviewee had been invited to the studio in order to represent civil weddings. There should have been no reason for a surprise had this person been an employee of a local magistrate or some other judicial body whose task it is to perform weddings. However, she represented a private company called Pro Seremonia, a firm founded by some anti-church and anti-religion associations.
You can see how the scene appeared. There is the church wedding (60%+) and then there is this other option, the civil wedding. Dear viewers, let's have a poll and find out what you think!
Of course, the Pro Seremonia person was in no position to represent people who choose civil weddings. After all, Pro Seremonia is a company selling their services to maybe a few dozen or hundred couples each year. No wonder, the lady was hesitant to give exact numbers. But the point is, the young and inexperienced reporter had no idea of what she had done. And I, naturally, had no choice but to adapt to the situation the best I could. Given these premises, I think the outcome was ok.
The funny thing was that the anti-church lady clearly had problems in keeping her composure. Church representatives and the active anti-church lobby rarely meet on even ground. She may have had wild ideas about what pastors represent. Or maybe they pump themselves up in (self)righteous wrath in their meetings, who knows. When we departed, I couldn't help saying "blessings". She was shocked and muttered, "Can I not receive that...?" Was she afraid that I put a spell on her?
After all, I think it was good that we met. This will be the scene more and more in the future. The younger generation clearly have no idea about and respect for the special place of the Church in our society. This brings the Church down from its pedestal. And it is always good for the church to be on the ground, fighting for its true identity.
I was surprised to find out that a second interviewee had been invited to the studio in order to represent civil weddings. There should have been no reason for a surprise had this person been an employee of a local magistrate or some other judicial body whose task it is to perform weddings. However, she represented a private company called Pro Seremonia, a firm founded by some anti-church and anti-religion associations.
You can see how the scene appeared. There is the church wedding (60%+) and then there is this other option, the civil wedding. Dear viewers, let's have a poll and find out what you think!
Of course, the Pro Seremonia person was in no position to represent people who choose civil weddings. After all, Pro Seremonia is a company selling their services to maybe a few dozen or hundred couples each year. No wonder, the lady was hesitant to give exact numbers. But the point is, the young and inexperienced reporter had no idea of what she had done. And I, naturally, had no choice but to adapt to the situation the best I could. Given these premises, I think the outcome was ok.
The funny thing was that the anti-church lady clearly had problems in keeping her composure. Church representatives and the active anti-church lobby rarely meet on even ground. She may have had wild ideas about what pastors represent. Or maybe they pump themselves up in (self)righteous wrath in their meetings, who knows. When we departed, I couldn't help saying "blessings". She was shocked and muttered, "Can I not receive that...?" Was she afraid that I put a spell on her?
After all, I think it was good that we met. This will be the scene more and more in the future. The younger generation clearly have no idea about and respect for the special place of the Church in our society. This brings the Church down from its pedestal. And it is always good for the church to be on the ground, fighting for its true identity.
Feb 12, 2008
Elections of the General Synod and Diocesan Boards
The elections for the General Synod and the Diocesan Boards were conducted yesterday and results are starting to come out. My first assessment is that there seems to be no major shift in church policies coming up. But a slight shift in balance might be enough for certain issues to become hot. Two of the most publicized issues for the newly elected General Synod will be to adapt rules of conduct in cases of openly homosexual clergy and to decide whether there should be a liturgical blessing for registered homosexual relationships. Unfortunately so.
Of course, this is my personal assessment only. These issues will definitely cause major division within the church. And there seems to be no way avoiding them. My hope is, however, that fresh thinking will help us avoid the worst case scenario. Local parishes should enforce policies where groups from different sides could coexist in peace and harmony. Well, maybe not harmony. That I don't have the courage to believe. But at least we could try to avoid kicking each others butts. Can we pray for that?
Of course, this is my personal assessment only. These issues will definitely cause major division within the church. And there seems to be no way avoiding them. My hope is, however, that fresh thinking will help us avoid the worst case scenario. Local parishes should enforce policies where groups from different sides could coexist in peace and harmony. Well, maybe not harmony. That I don't have the courage to believe. But at least we could try to avoid kicking each others butts. Can we pray for that?
Feb 3, 2008
The Future of the National Church in Finland
The discussion is heated. Most people tend to agree that there is no way the established Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Finland (in this text: "Church") can turn the tide and stop people from leaving its ranks. Registered Church membership is still amazingly around 82% but Helsinki is showing the way to the future with a mere 66%. There are projections that say membership in Helsinki will reach the 50% milepost by the year 2012.
The official Church strategy is to fight for the status quo. Defeat will not be admitted but it will be expected. The heat of the discussion revolves around who is to blame: the conservatives, the liberals, or the bureaucrats. The liberal Helsinki parishes (total registered membership over 400.000) are spending hundreds of thousands of euros on a marketing campaign that is basically saying "honestly, we are cool but the conservatives are ruining it for us". At the same time, active Christians flock in services where preaching is strong and theology is traditional. Those who appreciate more liberal views do not even bother. By staying home they send the message that it is ok for the Church to be for true believers only.
But there are other voices, those that are seldom heard and often neglected. It seems that the national agenda in the Church does not recognize these voices as being different. They are voices that are ecumenically orientated, globally informed and spiritually inspired. Pirjo-Liisa Penttinen is the general secreatery of the YWCA in Finland. She was the only official delegate from Finland at the Global Christian Forum in Nairobi in November. Returning from Nairobi she has been talking about this new wave within the ecumenical movement. Theological issues are not forgotten but they are put aside for a while to allow for true encounters in prayer. In these encounters, common focus on Christ as the hope for humanity is easily rediscovered.
And there are those who say that the Church in Finland can never give up its original mission to make all nations followers of Christ. The visions of languish should be replaced by visions of rejuvenation. Strategies of survival should be replaced by strategies of revival. And the production of self-flagellating publicity should be replaced by the joyful celebration of the Good News. And that all this can be done without ever dividing people into liberals and conservatives, if we just agree on Christ as the center of the Church. It is all just a matter of respect and giving a little space.
No wonder these voices are neglected. They sound too optimistic, too naive, and way too spiritual. And I would like to be one of them.
The official Church strategy is to fight for the status quo. Defeat will not be admitted but it will be expected. The heat of the discussion revolves around who is to blame: the conservatives, the liberals, or the bureaucrats. The liberal Helsinki parishes (total registered membership over 400.000) are spending hundreds of thousands of euros on a marketing campaign that is basically saying "honestly, we are cool but the conservatives are ruining it for us". At the same time, active Christians flock in services where preaching is strong and theology is traditional. Those who appreciate more liberal views do not even bother. By staying home they send the message that it is ok for the Church to be for true believers only.
But there are other voices, those that are seldom heard and often neglected. It seems that the national agenda in the Church does not recognize these voices as being different. They are voices that are ecumenically orientated, globally informed and spiritually inspired. Pirjo-Liisa Penttinen is the general secreatery of the YWCA in Finland. She was the only official delegate from Finland at the Global Christian Forum in Nairobi in November. Returning from Nairobi she has been talking about this new wave within the ecumenical movement. Theological issues are not forgotten but they are put aside for a while to allow for true encounters in prayer. In these encounters, common focus on Christ as the hope for humanity is easily rediscovered.
And there are those who say that the Church in Finland can never give up its original mission to make all nations followers of Christ. The visions of languish should be replaced by visions of rejuvenation. Strategies of survival should be replaced by strategies of revival. And the production of self-flagellating publicity should be replaced by the joyful celebration of the Good News. And that all this can be done without ever dividing people into liberals and conservatives, if we just agree on Christ as the center of the Church. It is all just a matter of respect and giving a little space.
No wonder these voices are neglected. They sound too optimistic, too naive, and way too spiritual. And I would like to be one of them.
Jan 27, 2008
Esta was here
Yesterday we had the pleasure of hosting a crowd of family members at our home. Everyone wanted to meet Esta in person. Especially because none of our youngest generation has ever met her before. It's a long time since 1975 when she was in Finland for a year as a 10-year-old schoolgirl.
Anna-Liisa retold the story of how Esta became her child. Esta's mother had been killed in an accident and her father needed desperately some help with the baby. He brought Esta to these two Finnish missionary ladies. They agreed to take the baby until he could remarry and take the baby back home. When Esta was three she was returned to her father but she had already taken Anna-Liisa as her mother. She refused to eat and was unhappy. Later when Anna-Liisa went there to meet the family Esta started to clap her hands and shout happily "Kotiin, kotiin!" There was no other way than to go to the social workers and sign the official documents. Esta was never adopted but it was agreed that she will stay with Anna-Liisa for upbringing.
It was nice to find some photos from 1987 when Tiina and I visited Tarime in Tanzania, where Anna-Liisa and Esta where living then. Esta was already married and their first son Edvin was a toddler. Our Siiri was born a year later.
Looking at the photos I must admit to some mixed feelings of nostalgia and amusement. I appear as a serious young man with a lot of good will but no sense of direction. There is a strange incompatibility between what I must have been thinking and how it appears. And the same phenomenon is and must be true even now. We tend to be blind to the things that are most obvious about us to others. And usually nobody wants to tell you what it is. Except children maybe. And so we are able to parade through our lives without ever discovering who we really are. This is a tragedy and it makes us humans pitiful and often ridiculous. But I think it also makes us lovable in God's eyes as he says: "I will not lay it to their charge for they know not what they are doing".
Anna-Liisa retold the story of how Esta became her child. Esta's mother had been killed in an accident and her father needed desperately some help with the baby. He brought Esta to these two Finnish missionary ladies. They agreed to take the baby until he could remarry and take the baby back home. When Esta was three she was returned to her father but she had already taken Anna-Liisa as her mother. She refused to eat and was unhappy. Later when Anna-Liisa went there to meet the family Esta started to clap her hands and shout happily "Kotiin, kotiin!" There was no other way than to go to the social workers and sign the official documents. Esta was never adopted but it was agreed that she will stay with Anna-Liisa for upbringing.
It was nice to find some photos from 1987 when Tiina and I visited Tarime in Tanzania, where Anna-Liisa and Esta where living then. Esta was already married and their first son Edvin was a toddler. Our Siiri was born a year later.
Looking at the photos I must admit to some mixed feelings of nostalgia and amusement. I appear as a serious young man with a lot of good will but no sense of direction. There is a strange incompatibility between what I must have been thinking and how it appears. And the same phenomenon is and must be true even now. We tend to be blind to the things that are most obvious about us to others. And usually nobody wants to tell you what it is. Except children maybe. And so we are able to parade through our lives without ever discovering who we really are. This is a tragedy and it makes us humans pitiful and often ridiculous. But I think it also makes us lovable in God's eyes as he says: "I will not lay it to their charge for they know not what they are doing".
Jan 20, 2008
Dear me
I really feel like writing to myself residing in another time and place. So, wherever you are and whatever you do, Artie, just remember that this blog will always be there for you... :-)
This coming week will give me a chance to cool down and relax. Hopefully. Just last August I spent a similar week in Järvenpää for another course in my pastoral curriculum. This time the subject matter deals with the parish as a working environment. The days will be full but the evenings will be spent in relative silence, or reading. I really need that now. Of course, Wednesday will make an exception. I will drive to Helsinki for the second night in the discussion series on Elements of a Growing Church. Something new is brewing here in Helsinki in this respect and I'd like to be a part of it.
This coming week will give me a chance to cool down and relax. Hopefully. Just last August I spent a similar week in Järvenpää for another course in my pastoral curriculum. This time the subject matter deals with the parish as a working environment. The days will be full but the evenings will be spent in relative silence, or reading. I really need that now. Of course, Wednesday will make an exception. I will drive to Helsinki for the second night in the discussion series on Elements of a Growing Church. Something new is brewing here in Helsinki in this respect and I'd like to be a part of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
